Bringing a medical device to market involves more than FDA approval—it requires intellectual property protection that aligns with innovation, clinical application, and business goals. At Brooks Kushman, we help companies protect and enforce the intellectual property that powers healthcare breakthroughs.
Brooks Kushman provides comprehensive support across the lifecycle of medical device intellectual property—from early-stage innovation through commercialization and enforcement. Our attorneys work with inventors, engineers, clinical teams, and regulatory consultants to identify protectable innovations and build intellectual property portfolios that support growth and investment.
We assist clients with U.S. and international patent prosecution, intellectual property due diligence, trade secret strategies, licensing, and post-grant challenges. Whether you’re building a wearable diagnostic device or a next-generation surgical instrument, our legal guidance is tailored to your technology, compliance needs, and business objectives.
With more than 11,000 patent applications filed over the last five years and a deep bench of technical expertise, Brooks Kushman brings the strategic experience necessary for today’s complex device landscape. Our team includes professionals with backgrounds in biomedical engineering, computer systems, and materials science, allowing us to understand the intricacies behind Class I and III devices.
Partnering with a medical device intellectual property attorney from our firm means working with someone who understands how to align patent scope with clinical application and regulatory timing. We help clients anticipate patentability, enforceability, and competitive positioning challenges, ensuring their intellectual property supports business continuity and long-term innovation.
Medical device technologies often combine engineering, materials science, electronics, software, and life sciences. Protecting these innovations requires attorneys who understand not only the device’s technical specifications but also how it interacts with the human body and complies with regulatory requirements. Our team has the technical and legal experience to protect devices across the full spectrum, from surgical instruments to AI-enabled diagnostic tools.
Medical device innovations may involve mechanical components, embedded software, diagnostic algorithms, or therapeutic delivery systems. We work with clients to develop claims that cover both structural and functional aspects, emphasizing technical improvements and real-world application. This approach supports patent eligibility in jurisdictions where software or diagnostic methods face heightened scrutiny.
Device development often runs parallel to regulatory review by agencies such as the FDA, EMA, or other national health authorities. We help clients coordinate their IP filings with regulatory submissions to ensure protection is secured before public disclosure and to align patent timelines with product approval and market launch plans.
Proprietary manufacturing processes, assembly techniques, material treatments, or calibration methods may provide a competitive edge that is better protected as trade secrets rather than through patenting. We assist clients in evaluating what should be kept confidential and in implementing confidentiality agreements, vendor controls, and internal protocols to maintain secrecy.
The medical device industry is densely populated with patents, and infringement risks can delay product launch or lead to costly litigation. We conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses to help clients identify potential risks early, evaluate licensing opportunities, and design around competitive patents where possible.
Medical devices are often commercialized in multiple jurisdictions, requiring coordinated global filing strategies. We develop protection plans that account for market priorities, regulatory differences, and jurisdiction-specific patentability standards, ensuring strong and enforceable rights across key regions such as the U.S., Europe, China, and Japan.
Many medical devices are developed in collaboration with component suppliers, research institutions, or technology partners. We help clients structure agreements that clearly define ownership of background IP, rights to jointly developed improvements, and licensing terms. This ensures proprietary technology is protected throughout the supply chain.
In addition to utility patents, design patents can be an important tool for protecting the unique look of a medical device, especially in competitive consumer-facing categories like wearables and home health monitoring systems. We help clients secure design protection that complements functional IP rights.
Medical devices often evolve through incremental improvements, new features, or alternative configurations. We work with clients to maintain protection over the entire product lifecycle, including securing patents for enhancements, next-generation models, and related accessories.
Any novel, useful, and non-obvious device—including hardware, embedded software, delivery systems, and processing algorithms—may be eligible, provided it meets USPTO criteria.
Yes. While subject to eligibility scrutiny, devices with integrated software, such as monitoring tools or control systems, can be protected through carefully drafted utility patents.
To avoid future disputes, joint development agreements should clearly define ownership, licensing rights, and disclosure obligations to ensure transparency and prevent misunderstandings. We help clients structure these protections early in the R&D process.
Yes. While we do not provide FDA regulatory services, we align intellectual property strategies with clinical milestones and approval timelines to preserve exclusivity and prevent premature disclosure of sensitive information.
Brooks Kushman protects the innovations shaping modern healthcare, from surgical tools to AI-driven diagnostics. Contact our team to learn how a medical device intellectual property attorney can help secure and enforce your inventions.
William Abbatt
Patent Prosecution & Patent Litigation
Michigan
Frank Angileri
Intellectual Property Litigation & Post-Grant Proceedings
Michigan
Rebecca Cantor
Patent, Trademark, Trade Secret Litigation, & Trademark Office Proceedings
Michigan
Mark Cantor
Shareholder & General Counsel
Michigan
William Conger
Chemical Patent Prosecution & Post Grant Proceedings
Michigan
Molly Crandall
Co-Chair Trademark
Michigan
Thomas Cunningham
Patent, Trademark, Copyright, & Trade Secret Litigation
Michigan
Tiffany Fidler, Ph.D.
Co-Chair Patent Prosecution
Michigan
John LeRoy
Executive Committee Member
Michigan
Marc Lorelli
Co-Chair Litigation
Michigan
Stephanie Mansfield, Ph.D.
Biomedical & Mechanical Patent Prosecution
Michigan
James Mueller
Patent Searching
James W. Proscia, Ph.D.
Applied Physics, Chemistry, Electrical, & Biotechnology Patent Prosecution
Nevada
Abdulai Rashid
Patent Prosecution & Intellectual Property Litigation
Michigan
Reza Roghani Esfahani
Intellectual Property Litigation
Michigan
Thomas A. Runk
Electrical & Software Patent Prosecution
California
Sangeeta Shah
President & Co-Chair Post-Grant Proceedings
Michigan
Christopher Smith
Co-Chair Litigation, Post-Grant Proceedings, Licensing, & Patentability Opinions
Michigan
Rachel Smith
Electrical/Software Patent Prosecution & Open Source Software Compliance
Michigan
Brett J. Smith
Mechanical & Electrical Patent Prosecution
Michigan
Michael Turner
Co-Chair Patent Prosecution
Michigan