Kyle Konz is an experienced patent attorney who takes the time to fully understand his clients’ technologies and business strategies to provide his clients with high-quality and tactical advice.
Kyle focuses his practice on patent prosecution, post grant proceedings, and patent and trademark litigation. Kyle also manages trademark portfolios for several small businesses. Kyle works with a wide range of clients including Fortune 100 Corporations and small businesses. Kyle writes and prosecutes patent applications related to automotive, manufacturing, domestic appliances, and heating and cooling systems. A large part of Kyle current post grant and litigation practices relate to vehicle safety systems, connectivity, connected services, lighting, and exercise equipment.
Kyle leverages his past engineering and hands-on experience to quickly learn inventions without requiring substantial time investments from inventors. Kyle’s practical experience allows him to understand how a particular invention fits within the larger system enabling him to fully capture the invention in context with the client’s overall goals. This provides the client with a more cohesive and valuable patent portfolio.
Prior to joining the firm, Kyle worked for a consulting firm, assisting in the design of commercial and residential developments. While there, Kyle focused on sewer systems, residential roadways, and drainage systems. Kyle is also a certified auto mechanic.
Outside of the office, Kyle enjoys action sports. In the winter, he is often found on the slopes with his snowboard, while in the summer he can be found behind a boat on his wakeboard.
Representative District Court/ITC Matters
Safe Driving Technologies, LLC v. Ford Motor Company (Patent Trial and Appeal Board): Served as Ford Motor Company’s litigation and Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) counsel, recently defended Ford in a patent infringement case filed by Safe Driving Technologies, LLC, which alleged Ford infringed four patents related to telematic safety features. Under Brooks Kushman’s direction, Ford filed Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) against the four asserted patents. The PTAB ultimately held 43 claims unpatentable, with the plaintiff dedicating an additional 10 claims to the public. Brooks Kushman also represented Ford in the appeal, where the judgment was affirmed. Case No. 1:21-cv-00064
Represents an automotive original equipment manufacturer on the prosecution of patents related to hybrid controls, transmission controls, electric motors, and climate control systems.
Represents a global Tier 1 automotive supplier on the prosecution of patents related to engine, driveline, clutches, and bearings.
Represents a craft distilling business on managing and procuring trademarks.
Education
J.D., Wayne State University, cum laude
B.S., Civil Engineering, Michigan State University
Organizations & Affiliations
State Bar of Michigan
Michigan Intellectual Property Association (MIPLA), President
Federal Bar Association Eastern District of Michigan Chapter
Inn of Court, Michigan Chapter
Recognitions
“The Best Lawyers in America,” Best Lawyers, 2027
“Up-and-Coming Lawyer,” Michigan Lawyers Weekly, 2025
Presentations
Co-Presenter, “The Evolving Landscape of PTAB Proceedings: Developments, Decisions, and Best Practices,” BK Hosted Webinar, January 2026
Co-Presenter, “Year in Review: 2024 Intellectual Property Litigation,” BK Hosted Webinar, January 2025
Co-Presenter, “2024 PTAB Year in Review: New Procedures and Potential Changes Impact AIA Trial Strategies,” BK Hosted Webinar, January 2025
Panelist, “Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Society Panel,” Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Society, University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, November 2021
Publications
Author, “Upcoming Fee Adjustment Affects All Information Disclosure Statements (IDS), Not Just the Large Ones,” Brooks Kushman Client Alerts, December 2024
Co-Author, “Brooks Kushman Secures Federal Circuit Affirmance for Ford Motor Company in Patent Dispute, Upholding PTAB Rulings that the Asserted Automobile Safety Patents are Unpatentable,” Brooks Kushman Client Alerts, November 2024
Co-Author, “Director Vidal Issues Favorable Ruling in Ford IPR,” Brooks Kushman Client Alerts, March 2024
Co-Author, “Federal Circuit Confirms Dynamic Drinkware Analysis For Provisional Applications As Prior Art,” Brooks Kushman Trending IP Blog, June 2020