Ex Parte Reexamination

Notwithstanding the new post-grant options established by the America Invents Act (AIA), Ex Parte Reexamination remains intact-- allowing a patent owner or third party to obtain another examination of an already-granted patent.

The request for reexamination may be brought at any point during the patent’s enforceability period, and must demonstrate “a substantial new question of patentability” for the matter to proceed. If review is granted, the Ex Parte Reexamination process continues with the following features:

  • Upon written request to the U.S Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), the identity of the party requesting reexamination is kept confidential, unlike post-grant proceedings.
  • After the request is filed, the third-party is excluded from the proceedings unless the patent owner files a statement in opposition to the third party’s allegations.
  • The patent owner may not enlarge the scope of a patent claim by amendment, but may propose an amendment to the patent to distinguish the claim from prior art or to remedy a decision negative to the claim.
  • Ex Parte Reexaminations are heard by a three-person panel of examiners from the USPTO’s Central Reexamination Unit, unlike Post-Grant Reviews and Inter Partes Reviews, which are heard by the Patent Trial & Appeals Board.
  • Only the patent owner may appeal the final decision of the Central Reexamination Unit, first to the Patent Trial & Appeal Board, then to the Court of U.S. Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
  • Estoppel does not arise from an Ex Parte Reexamination.

Crafting a Post-Grant Strategy

The attorneys at Brooks Kushman are experienced in identifying, prioritizing, and pursuing or defending reexamination and post-grant review options according to each client’s needs and interests. Regardless of whether the path leads through administrative proceedings or courtroom litigation, we’re ready to guide you through every step along the way.

Strategy & Foresight

Brooks Kushman understands the intricacies and implications of post-grant challenges, how to staff such matters, what resources to deploy, and the technical issues at the heart of each matter. Our attorneys know what it takes to vigorously represent our clients and prevail in such administrative proceedings and coordinate efforts with possible parallel district court litigation and on appeal, recognizing the impact a decision can have on a patent portfolio, market opportunities, and the bottom line. At the same time, our prosecution team works closely with our clients to develop and implement client-specific strategies to help insulate a patent portfolio from a post-grant challenge. In conjunction with our Patent Searchers, we can track related post-grant proceedings, monitor patent filings from our clients’ competitors, and search for and examine relevant prior art—to anticipate potential future challenges and institute proactive measures to minimize any potential risk. In view of the changing landscape and complex and competing interests at play, Brooks Kushman is able to leverage its depth of experience in all facets of IP, to help our clients’ maintain competitive advantage.

  • Brooks Kushman Hires Prominent IP Professional; Opens Washington D.C. Office
    Wednesday, October 12, 2016

    Southfield, Mich. – (October 12, 2016) – Brooks Kushman is pleased to announce the firm has expanded to Washington, D.C., opening its third office with the addition of Lissi Mojica. The new office is located within walking distance of the Unites States Patent and Trademark Office. The new office will be...

    • Brooks Kushman Earns Gold Honors in Patent 1000 Listing
      Monday, June 09, 2014

      SOUTHFIELD, Mich. – Brooks Kushman, intellectual property and technology law firm, is now listed in Intellectual Asset Management`s (IAM) annual Patent 1000, a guide that recognizes the world`s top patent law firms and practitioners in key jurisdictions. The 2014 IAM Patent 1000 issue marks the first time any firms from...

      • Brooks Kushman Shareholder Andrew Turner to Present at PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference
        Tuesday, February 04, 2020

        SOUTHFIELD, Mich. – Brooks Kushman shareholder Andrew Turner will be participating in a panel at the PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference in Washington, D.C. in March. The PTAB Bar Association’s Annual Conference brings together practitioners, in-house counsel, and members of the bench for a dynamic discussion of the Patent Trial Appeal...

        • PTAB Year in Review: New Designated Decisions and Procedures Impact AIA Trial Strategies
          Friday, January 15, 2021

          While 2020 was an impactful year for everyone, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated numerous decisions and implemented procedural changes that affect AIA Trial Practice. These new developments include: Rule Changes (Institution, Presumptions) and Clarification Memos (Applicant Admitted Prior Art) Discretionary Denials due to Prior Examination (Advanced Bionics) and Parallel...

        • PTAB Year in Review - Designated Decisions, Constitutional Challenges, and AIA Procedures
          Monday, January 13, 2020

          The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) continued to have a meaningful impact on IP litigation in 2019 as the preferred venue for challenging validity. There were a number of significant developments at the PTAB in 2019 including: numerous designated decisions, Constitutional challenges, and several procedural updates that will affect...