• Overview
  • Representative Matters
  • Background
  • Featured Content
  • Insights

Tom Lewry is an experienced patent litigator with a broad range of expertise in intellectual property matters as well as general business contracts, trade secret misappropriation, and shareholder derivative matters.

Tom has over 40 years of experience in intellectual property litigation. He’s handled everything from intellectual property disputes to general business conflicts, including fraud, breach of contract, tortious interference, trade secret misappropriation, breach of fiduciary duty, and shareholder derivative matters. Tom has tried cases in federal and state courts around the country.

Tom has a wealth of litigation experience in a variety of technology areas and has successfully tried cases relating to patents, trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights in state and federal courts throughout the country. He’s driven the firm’s adoption of innovative technology in the courtroom and for delivery of client information.

Tom has been an Adjunct Professor at Wayne State Law School and a Visiting Scholar at the University of Michigan teach patent law fundamentals.

Tom has traveled to all 50 states and all 7 continents and loves all things tech. Tom enjoys watching the sunset over Lake Michigan in Northern Michigan and learning history.

Representative District Court/ITC Matters

Versata Software v. Ford Motor Company (E.D. Michigan and E.D. Texas): Brooks Kushman served as lead counsel for Ford in lawsuits involving over 30 alleged trade secrets, 16 patents, 5 copyrights and 3 breach of contract claims relating to complex enterprise software for product configuration. Versata originally sought over $1.4 Billion in damages from Ford.  After more than 8 years of litigation in federal courts in Michigan and Texas, more than 20 IPRs/CBMRs, over 60 depositions, over 1000 docket entries including multiple rounds of claim construction, summary judgment and Daubert challenges, and a three-week jury trial, our team held Versata to just $3 in nominal damages. Case No. 2:15-cv-10628.

z4 v. Microsoft and Autodesk (Jury Trial – E.D. Texas): Represented z4 in a patent infringement case involving two patents relating to technology for reducing software piracy. Infringing products included Microsoft’s Windows and Office software, and Autodesk’s AutoCAD software. Brooks Kushman secured a $133 million jury verdict, and a $25 million enhanced damages award for z4. The Federal Circuit affirmed the jury verdict. Case No. 507 F.3d 1340

Cheetah Omni, LLC v. Verizon Services Corporation, et al. (Jury Trial – E.D. Texas): Represented Cheetah Omni in a patent infringement lawsuit concerning fiber optic switching technology. Secured a $5.4 million jury verdict. Case No. 6:11-cv-00160

Johns-Manville Corp. v. Guardian Industries Corp. (Judgment for plaintiff – E.D. Michigan): Represented plaintiff in a trade secret and patent infringement suit involving fiberglass manufacturing. 586 F.Supp. 1034, 221 USPQ 319

Hilgraeve Corporation v. Symantec Corporation (Settlement – E.D. Michigan): Counsel for plaintiff in a patent infringement action involving anti-virus software. Secured a $62.5 million settlement for our client on the eve of trial. Case No. 97-cv-40370

Cheetah Omni, LLC v. Alcatel-Lucent, et al. (Settlement – E.D Texas): Represented Cheetah Omni in a patent infringement case against the leading optical telecommunications companies. Cases resulted in favorable settlements for our client. Case No. 6:11CV390

Omni MedSci, Inc. v. Leica Microsystems, Inc. (Settlement – N.D. Illinois): Represented plaintiff in a patent infringement case relating to confocal microscope systems that use fiber light sources to perform spectroscopy. Case resulted in a favorable settlement. Case No. 1:17-cv-1977

Sutmyn v. Storage Technology Corp. (Summary Judgment – N.D. California): Represented defendant in a patent infringement matter involving virtual storage systems. Successfully defended against antitrust claims. Case Nos. C97-20105 RMW & C97-20629 RMW (consolidated)

Waner v. Ford Motor Co. (Jury Trial – U.S. District Court, South Dakota): Defended Ford Motor Co. on a patent infringement matter involving heavy-duty trucks. Case No. Civ. 98-5061-KES; 331 F.3d 851

Palmer v. Fox Software Inc. et al. (N.D. Ohio): Successfully defended breach of fiduciary duty claims. $22 million jury verdict reduced by remittitur to $13 million; reversed on appeal – no cause of action.
107 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 1997); 1997 WL 67851 (Fed. Cir. 1997)

Expeditors International v. Vastera, Inc. (Jury Trial – E.D. Michigan): In a case watched closely by the customs industry (See Customs Brokerage Industry Narrowly Escapes Restructuring, Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter, October 4, 2004), Expeditors alleged Vastera had misappropriated over 325 trade secrets relating to the customs brokerage industry and sought $150 million in damages. Tom represented Vastera. The jury found for Vastera and the Court ordered Expeditors to pay over $400 thousand in fees to Vastera. Case No. 2:01-cv-71000

 

Education

J.D., University of Michigan

B.S., Computer Engineering, University of Michigan

Organizations & Affiliations

State Bar of Michigan, Computer Law Section, Past Chair; Patent and Trademark Office Committee

University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Visiting Scholar

American Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section; Computer Applications User Group, Past Chair

Michigan Intellectual Property Law Association

Computer Law Association

Recognitions

“Notable Practitioner” IP Stars, Managing Intellectual Property, 2024

“Leading Lawyers,” Leading Lawyers Magazine, 2017-2019, 2025

“Super Lawyer,” Super Lawyers, 2007 – 2012, 2014 – 2018, 2020-2024

“IP Star,” Managing IP, 2024

“Legal Lions of the Week”, Law 360, 2023

“The Best Lawyers in America,” Best Lawyers, 2017-2023

“Top Lawyer,” DBusiness Magazine, 2016, 2019-2021

 

47 results